Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Perspectives's avatar

Hello Dan, and hello everybody. In a comment below I said my reading habits have changed enormously, just since a few weeks ago. Now all of a sudden, I am reading a dozen books at a time, not one by one. So I couldn't possibly have time to read them cover to cover, but finding key chapters.

On the 17th JD Vance (39) accepted the Republican nomination to run as vice president. On the 18th I read a review of his book, Hillbilly Elegy. Today I have the book, and so far have read the introduction. I think normally I would not have been much interested, but as a possible future Vice President, that interest level changes.

Vance's origin is from Appalachia. Their plight, their poverty and their mind-set about it, were who he was. It is said that Appalachia hasn't changed its stubborn adherence to stereotypes of thinking for 100's of years, from way before those Scotch-Irish migrated to the USA.

After high school Vance served for 4 years with the 2nd Marine Aircraft Wing at Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point in North Carolina. He says, he learned to "give it my all" as a corporal in the news media service. After the Marines, Vance was able to "ACE" college and Law School. He is a Senator from Ohio.

From Hillbilly Elegy; Vance loves the people of Appalachia, and of course he loves the Marine core. Appalachian poverty has been unmanageable for centuries. Their common attitude about it is very disempowering. What would a Vice President be able to do to confront an intractable problem area that is one of his major concerns?

Below, Dan said, "Degradation starts when the person loses the willingness to seek solutions."

That is the primary condition revealed in Hillbilly Elegy, {I have not read it yet} but that also has to be tempered with a new opportunity landscape. What can Vance do about it if he wins as VP? That will be very interesting to watch. If something about it works; I am sure it will spill over onto other poverty "groups". It could be a big part of Trump's MAGA.

I think changing attitudes takes hands-on mentoring. The Marine core can change attitudes. Could the military become involved in civil mentoring? Retired marines could certainly fill positions in a civil project. How would Vance put it together? I think he could get it financed. Changing attitudes would take participant commitment, not just come and go as you please. Yet it couldn't be like a Chinese "re-education camp", or could it?

Here's my copy of the book, let's read it together and follow these developments. I'll make a new post for discussions.

https://braxwest.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/690296499_6699d1e5b3f07.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIPW3G47VXLJOZITA&Expires=1721383771&Signature=GoMD5601BrHSBpY%2FgvDJ%2F0yXv84%3D

Link now works.

.

Expand full comment
Dan...'s avatar

1) The monologue. Out of my league. I read the first paragraph. Nothing there. And no explanation or introduction. Out of context. In itself. Not to say, “What about my context?” No message, no takeaway, no encouragement, no clickbait. No promise.

Normally, I’d give up right there. Not because this thing is useless. Because my perception is not in tune with it - now, here. But… out of courtesy, I forced myself to the second paragraph.

Ah, a story. What about? No idea. What for? No indications. Why? No info. A story. If my life was empty (= with no stories of my own), I’d probably read on. Actress in Paris? Who cares? That was it. End of story.

This form may work when the audience worships the monologuer, or, at least, holds them in some regard. The aura of being a unique personality helps. Like those big-time stage flights of Jobs or Musk. There is literally nothing there, but the audience paid so much that they won’t admit it. They will wait for one line of life wisdom that will turn their empty minds into “I am like him” games.

That’s it about monologue. A form that is out of tune with me. Or the other way round.

2) “Perspectives are different ways to interpret what we see.” To see, we need a vantage point. The interpretation will always depend on it. Like climbing a ladder and extending the reach of the vision, discovering new elements of the landscape. Or 3D paintings: https://mymodernmet.com/3d-street-art-illusions/

3) “Any new perspectives must be introduced gently.” So terrorizing and tyrannical. What about quick methods? Rapid onset of new insights breaking the walls of established routines? All deep transformations come only from surprise. The bypassing of the mind and teleporting the awareness into a new life.

4) “This is Substack, and we are readers and writers.” What about bots, agenda pushers, pretend scientists, fake conversations, advertising harvesters? So many personalities in play…

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts